
Meryl Steep the mother of four children, is completely against selling rich and famous baby pictures to the press, even if the money does goes charity.
“One thing I learned very early on is that when you’re famous, you lose your right to privacy. If you promote your children, have them photographed, then they lose their rights. But, if you do not have them photographed and (do not) sell them to OK! Magazine, they have the right to ….privacy and citizenship. They (paparazzi) can follow me; take a picture, whatever they want to do. My kids, no.”
Missy, like me, agrees with Streep, but thinks that because actors are vain they would want to show their children off like most of us do.
I, on the other hand cannot understand taking your child’s free will and privacy from him.
Although For the very hot and paparazzi bothered celebs, like Brad and Angelina, I think it would be very hard to shield their kids from the paparazzi in this case maybe - “if you can’t beat them join them” might make sense, especially if the press pay huge amounts that can be put into good use.
Louise Profile
Subscribe To Louise's Blog





Write your blog with non-techie tools and be widely read thanks to our large, active community.
more posts...